From the “Response to AronRa” series.
I decided to skip ahead to video 24, since it's something of a conclusion to the previous 10 videos (according to AronRa) – I got lucky picking 'Mammalia' I guess.
However, there appears to be nothing to respond to in this video.
No polemical value wrt the idea of a theist responding to an atheist in this one.
This section is usually written during a final watch after I've seen the video through once or twice. Then I go back and write the summary (above).
At 0:30 AronRa sets up Richard Owen (Darwin's Mentor) as a prototypical creationist, who is then proven so obviously wrong by Darwin's science. This is unqualified expert opinion because we do not necessarily interpret the Genesis accounts using the sort of eisegesis that Richard Owen used. Granted this is only AronRa's insinuation, but the point seems clearly made to anyone who is thinking about what AronRa is saying.